College Blog Blog Network

Mobley forced to retire…

12.12.08 at 9:59 am ET
By   |   Comments

He was on one of the most talented hoops teams to ever come out of the Ocean State. Cuttino Mobley teammed with Tyson Wheeler to form one of the most deadly backcourts at the University of Rhode Island. Now, a heart condition has forced Mobley to call it a career. The 11-year veteran, currently with the New York Knicks, made it official on Thursday. Before his productive career with Houston, Orlando, Sacramento, the Los Angeles Clippers and the Knicks, he played for current B.C. coach Al Skinner and Jim Harrick.

Read More: Al Skinner, Cuttino Mobley, Jim Harrick, Rhode Island Rams

Cowboy down…

12.11.08 at 8:59 pm ET
By   |   Comments

Our friend Albert Breer of The Sporting News warned us of what to expect from these underachieving Dallas Cowboys and now, whaddya know… ESPN’s Ed Werder reported Thursday night that the Cowboys are now in conflict. Shockah! Following their Thanksgiving Day win over the Seattle Seahawks, the 8-5 Pokes are coming off a 20-13 loss to Pittsburgh in which they were outscored 17-0 in the fourth quarter. Word is that Terrell Owens and Tony Romo are in serious ‘conflict’ in Cowboys camp, hardly the unity that T-O showed following their playoff loss to the Giants last January. And now this. Just the way you want to head into a critical Sunday night match-up against a New York Giants team trying to rebound from its 20-14 loss to Philadelphia last Sunday.

Read More: Dallas Cowboys, New York Giants, Terrell Owens, Tony Romo

Around the NFL…

12.11.08 at 12:54 pm ET
By   |   Comments

The days of Romeo Crennel and GM Phil Savage in Cleveland certainly appear to be waning. From the fine folks at Pro Football Talk, candidates are starting to line up as the team suffers through a remarkably disappointing 4-9 season. Then there’s that OTHER team in Ohio that has NFL membership and licensing privileges. Gotta love Chad Ochocinco. Only he could draw attention to a 1-11-1 team by predicting his team will be better next season. What Detroit wouldn’t give for a guy like that? Maybe they will in the off-season.

Read More: Chad Johnson, Phil Savage, Romeo Crennel,

How much (or little) must CC Sabathia pitch to earn your yearly salary?

12.10.08 at 3:22 pm ET
By   |   Comments

ESPN took the math out of it for the rest of us.  Head over their site right now and check out one of their new features, Salary Crunch.

You can also compare your earnings to A-Rod, K-Rod, Dustin Pedroia and others.

I won’t mention how much I make, but let’s just CC could start the 2009 season with the worst outing of his career and still “earn” much Much MUCH more than I make in a year.

I’ll now go back my coupon clipping.

Thanks to Jess for the tip.

Read More: cc sabathia, salary crunch, we're all pathetic,

20 Years Later Billy Ripken Finally Talks About The Obscenity Bat

12.10.08 at 1:43 pm ET
By   |   Comments

Darren Rovell over at CNBC was recently able to get Billy Ripken to expound upon the circumstances surrounding his infamous “F**k Face” bat and the 1989 Fleer baseball card it spawned.  If you’re not familar with the card at all then we probably shouldn’t be friends.  Do me a favor and check out the article.  Rovell even convinced the editors over at CNBC to post a photo of the card, unedited.  Slightly shocking.

As you can see, Ripken is still affected today by the events back then:

“When people recognize me, I see the look on their face. They think of the card immediately and, before they even ask, I say, ‘Yeah, it was me.’ I don’t know if it happens daily, but, to this day, it still happens a couple of times a week.”

Billy Ripken Obscenity Bat: He Finally Talks 20 Years Later (CNBC)

Read More: baseball cards, billy ripken, f**k face,

Big Baby living up to his name?

12.08.08 at 3:08 pm ET
By   |   Comments

Glen “Big Baby” Davis apparently shedding a tear or two after KG had some words for him.  Take a look for yourself:

Read More: big baby, celtics, crying,

Look who showed up

12.07.08 at 11:33 am ET
By   |   Comments

David Ortiz had a golf tournament … it was cool!

Best part: Our blogger friend Sean Casey keeping it real in the DR.

Read More: David Ortiz, red sox, Sean Casey,

Can Joe Thurston lure C.C. Sabathia to Red Sox?

12.06.08 at 10:14 pm ET
By   |   Comments

OK, that’s not what this Ken Rosenthal article is about, but I just wanted to throw it out there. Joe Thurston, the utilityman who played in four games with the Red Sox last year, is C.C. Sabathia’s first cousin. Coincidence he played for the Sox the year before Sabathia becomes a free agent? OK, the answer is yes. Good times!

Rosenthal brings up some solid points when talking about a possible Sabathia to Sox match, but at the end of the day I just don’t see it transpiring. I think the stars have to align perfectly for the Red Sox to offer any kind of long-term deal to a pitcher (see Daisuke Matsuzaka), and with as many pitches as C.C. has thrown over the past few years (averaging a major league-high of 106.5 per game over the past three seasons) there appears to be just a few stars out of whack. 

Best part: Let the WInter Meeting guessing begin, and this is a good start by Ken …

The best guess is that the Red Sox will end up with Teixeira and sign free-agent right-hander Derek Lowe, 35, to a short-term, high-dollar deal.

David Ortiz wants to make something clear to all reporters: If you want to break news you better attend his charity golf tournament. This year’s bombshell: Alex Rodriguez officially announced he will be playing for the Dominican Republic in the upcoming World Baseball Classic.

Best part: David Ortiz has a golf tournament.

Rebuilding the 2004 Red Sox via the ’08-’09 free agent market

12.05.08 at 3:45 pm ET
By   |   Comments

Dan Tobin over at Bugs & Cranks has an interesting post up reconstructing the 2004 Red Sox from players available as free agents right this moment.  That’s right, you can almost completely recreate the actual roster from back in 2004, sans David Ortiz and a few others.  Some of the guys aren’t from the 2004 team, but it comes close.

Check out the starters:

C: Jason Varitek* (catching three no-hitters)
1B: Kevin Millar* (‘€Borrrrrn in the USA’€)
2B: Mark Loretta (walkoff homer’€¦ ON PATRIOTS DAY!!!!)
SS: Orlando Cabrera* (those wonderful handshakes)
3B: Ramon Vazquez (you wouldn’€™t believe how few 3B free agents there are)
LF: Manny Ramirez* (World Series MVP)
CF: Gabe Kapler* (that 19-18 photo with Johnny Damon)
RF: Trot Nixon* (take your pick)
DH: Doug Mientkiewicz* (eventually giving the ball back)

SP: Curt Schilling* (something about a sock that’€™s now in Cooperstown)
SP: Pedro Martinez* (every second of his time in Boston was a highlight for me, aside from one inning in late October 2003)
SP: Derek Lowe* (clinching all three 2004 playoff series)
SP: Paul Byrd (ate some innings)
SP: Bartolo Colon (ate everything else)

Dan continues with RP and bench options, so head over to B&C for the full post.

Read More: 2004 red sox,

Should Masterson start?

12.05.08 at 11:56 am ET
By   |   Comments

This is what our friends over at “Fire Brand of the American League” are wondering aloud …

A lot of good points in here, and I do think Masterson could certainly be plopped into the middle of the rotation and do just fine. The bullpen, however, suits him better in an ideal world. His velocity was up a few ticks when coming out of the pen and the room for error when it comes to getting lefties out is smaller. Regardless of where he ends up, I believe one of the greatest traits that Masterson possesses is his maturity and approach. As John Farrell said, he not only soaks in advice, but then has the ability to actually go out and make it translate into game situations. Gold Jerry, gold!

Best part: I’m going to get me some ‘xFIP’ for Christmas …

His xFIP, (a pitcher’s ERA that is both normalized and includes only things a pitcher is directly responsible for) however, was almost a full run higher at 4.28. As a No. 5 starter, a 4.28 xFIP would be rather impressive, but can he be counted on to maintain that?

I thank author Evan for explaining this, because it is good info that could escape some who would automatically say, “You lost me at ‘x'”