College Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
#GaysForTrump president explains why the LGBT community should vote Republican 03.07.17 at 1:58 pm ET
By   |  Comments Off on #GaysForTrump president explains why the LGBT community should vote Republican
Peter Boykin, president of #GaysForTrump, says Donald Trump's administration is pro-LGBT. (Photo provided)

Peter Boykin, president of #GaysForTrump, says Donald Trump’s administration is pro-LGBT. (Photo provided)

The concept of being a gay Republican seems contradictory. While I understand people are more than one-issue voters, it’s impossible for me to embrace a political party that doesn’t recognize my right to marry and thinks parents should be able to send their kids to conversion therapy, which is nothing more than medical quackery. Perhaps that makes me small-minded, but I prefer to support people who aren’t hostile towards my way of life.

It’s no secret the overwhelming majority of the gay community also stands on the left side of the aisle. According to a 2016 Pew poll, 82 percent of LGB voters identify as Democrats, whereas only 18 percent say they lean right. In last year’s election, 78 percent of voters who are gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender pulled the lever for Hillary Clinton. Donald Trump, despite his relatively liberal stance on gay rights, drew just 14 percent of the LGBT vote. (In 2012, Mitt Romney pulled in 22 percent of the gay vote.)

One of Trump’s most prominent LGB supporters is Peter Boykin, president of #GaysforTrump. The group, which Boykin says has up to 10,000 names in its database, played a central role in organizing the pro-Trump rallies across the country last weekend.

For the most part, Boykin sounds like a typical Trump supporter. He boasts about Trump’s plans to build a wall on the Mexican border and invest heavily in infrastructure.

“[Trump] sees what I see: lots of crappy roads and poor people everywhere, really huge debts,” Boykin says. “And what do we have? A failing economy, no jobs, bad military. America has gone in very bad disrepair, yet we owe ‘craptons’ of money.”

When the topic turns to gay issues, Boykin is quick to point out Trump’s support for same-sex marriage and pledge to protect LGBT people from radical Islamic terror. He also makes sure to tell me President Barack Obama, who’s beloved in the gay community, didn’t support marriage equality when he first took office.

Though those statements are factually accurate, it’s difficult for me to consider Trump a genuine ally. He filled up his administration with a swath of social conservatives, including Vice President Mike Pence. As a congressman, Pence voted against the Employment Non-Discirmination Act and said gay couples signaled “societal collapse.” He continued his anti-LGBT streak as governor of Indiana, when he signed a religious freedom bill that would’ve allowed business to refuse to serve gay people. (He eventually changed the law’s language after immense outcry from social advocacy groups and the business community.)

Boykin recognizes Pence’s history, but says the Vice President is a changed man. He also says factions of Democrats are just as opposed to gay rights as conservatives, despite the party’s LGBT-friendly platform.

In my conversation with Boykin, we further explored the rationalization behind his Trump support. Answers are edited for brevity.

Alex Reimer: Do you think Donald Trump is an ally to the LGBT movement more so than Hillary Clinton and other Democrats?

Peter Boykin: I believe Donald Trump is the first Republican to take office that is pro-LGBT rights –– and particularly our safety. He is still going to be a little bit of the legalese and make sure things are legal. But you’re comparing him to somebody like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton who in their past, especially Barack Obama when he took office, he was not for gay rights. He grew into that.

AR: But you would agree that gay rights improved dramatically under Obama’s presidency, right?

PB: Only because it was coming. Not because of him. We had very good Supreme Court decisions coming through. You had many, many court cases that went through. These things have been going on for a long time. It was because of groups like Log Cabin Republicans and stuff that worked towards those. Not because Barack Obama signed a bill. People think that the president just signs a bill and then all of a sudden he’s the one doing it all –– just like they tried to say that Trump has taken away [transgender] kids rights or whatever, just because they sent back a guideline that already a year ago was struck down, because it was already in the courts struck down while Barack Obama was in office. … All of the guidelines were already null and void. So Donald Trump said that, ‘Well, instead of just continuing on with something that was already broken anyway,’ he said, ‘We’re going to send it back to the courts and let them and states decide and continue and work towards what’s needed and to make it legal.’ The only way to do that is through the court system and state’s rights. You can’t just make things legal. It wasn’t a law.

AR: When I look at Trump, I agree with you. I think personally, Trump is pro-LGBT. He grew up in socially liberal New York, he’s stated support for gay rights personally. But it’s hard for me to consider him an ally when he supported the GOP party platform, which as you know had opposition for [same-sex marriage] …

PB: He went against that platform. When he went on that floor and said he supported LGBT rights and brought Peter Thiel out there, he went against the GOP Platform.

AR: So then what do you make of a guy like Mike Pence, who has opposed the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, says being gay is a choice …

PB: We’ve also got Mike Pence who went on an ABC interview and said that kind of LGBT discrimination will not be happening in the Trump administration. Pence is the same guy who looked at my ‘Gays for Trump’ hashtag ‘Make America Great Again hat,’ and I was like, ‘Yeah we’re for you.’ And he was like, ‘OK,’ and he signed my hat. Regardless of what he did in the past –– people always tell me when I bring up Barack Obama’s and Hillary Clinton’s pasts, and they always say, ‘Well that’s in the past.’ I’m going to tell you the same thing. That’s in his past. He is the vice president under Trump and there’s a reason he’s doing this job. And he can change just like anybody else. I can give Hillary the benefit of the doubt, I can give Barack Obama the benefit of the doubt, we can definitely give Mike Pence the benefit of the doubt.

AR: So you think Mike Pence, who admittedly has an exceptionally conservative record when it comes to gay rights issues, you think he’s totally changed?

PB: “He has a religious-based record. Liberal LGBT people usually try to put religion with anti-LGBT, and it does not always happen that way. Me and [fashion designer] Andre [Soriano] just went to Catholic mass yesterday and nobody cares. We were two gay guys in a church. They don’t care. Most people don’t care about regular LGBT anymore. Now they’re kind of getting scared about the transgender [issue].

AR: I feel like a lot of what people used to say about gay people –– we’re looking to molest your children, we’re real perverts and deviants. I feel like the stuff they used to say about us, they’re now saying about transgender people. And that’s wrong.

PB: Yeah, like ‘that man in that dress is going to want to mess with my daughter.’ And I’m like, ‘Yeah, they don’t care about your daughter. They don’t care about your son.’ Frankly, they just want to go use the bathroom.

AR: Exactly. So on that point, you would agree there still are a lot of prominent voices in the Republican Party that do say that kind of stuff about gay people, transgender people. So how do you align yourself with them after knowing their opposition to your personal lifestyle?

PB: Well, to tell you the truth,I can be in the Republican Party just as easily as I could be in the Democratic Party. There’s a ‘crapload’ of voices in the Democratic Party who hate gays as well.

AR: Who?

PB: We’re talking about southern Democrats, southern Christians. We’re talking about a lot of black people that are black Democrats. They cannot stand homosexuality, and they are Democrats. There’s just as many Democrats as there are Republicans that cannot stand gays.

AR: But then why is the Democratic Party platform supportive of LGBT rights and the GOP platform is not?

PB: Because they can get their vote. Then a lot of religious people just kind of stay back and they don’t say anything. They just want the vote. As long as they get their people in, they just use as a vote. That’s all they care [about]. They’re using black people for their votes, too. But people are waking up. Donald Trump was right: They’re using ya’ll as a vote.

AR: What do you think about Neil Gorsuch and other conservative justices who Trump will likely appoint to the federal courts. What do you think they’ll do when they’re faced with cases about LGBT rights? Does that worry you?

PB: No, because people always talked negatively of Justice Scalia, because he didn’t want to try the gay marriage act. But you know what? He was doing his job as a constitutionalist. … So when Donald Trump says he wants to have a justice who will dictate by the Constitution, it’s not anti-LGBT. It’s basically a justice who will do his job and be supportive of what’s in the Constitution. Period.

We can’t just send everything to the Supreme Court. We have to let state’s rights dictate things. That’s one of the reasons why the Civil War was fought –– state’s rights. Not letting the federal government dictate to every state what we’re going to do.

AR: But throughout history, a lot of civil rights progress can’t be left to the states. Look at African-American [segregation] in the 50’s and 60’s. If it weren’t for a lot of federal initiatives, who knows how long it would’ve taken in some southern states.

PB: Well, we got to the point where we got enough states on board, like we did with the gay marriage issue. … It’s just that, any time you change a law like this, it takes time. It takes time to move things. We’re talking about something that’s economic when you talk about the [transgender] bathroom issue. Some people want a separate toilet, some people say they don’t want a separate toilet because it makes them feel bad. … We have that problem. That issue will have to continue. Maybe it will take a number of generations to ease into it, just like generations eased into the gay issue. Now we have a generation where people don’t give a crap if somebody is gay or not. Maybe the next generation will be fine with transgender people. That’s the reason people are born and die. People’s ideas change. 

Read More: Donald Trump,
ESPN will reportedly undergo massive layoffs again 03.06.17 at 10:13 am ET
By   |  Comments Off on ESPN will reportedly undergo massive layoffs again
ESPN laid off roughly 300 workers in October 2015. (Ron Chenoy/USA Today Sports)

ESPN laid off roughly 300 workers in October 2015. (Ron Chenoy/USA Today Sports)

For the second time in three years, it looks like ESPN will undergo significant layoffs. But unlike the purge in 2015, which primarily affected workers behind the scenes, faces that appear in front of the camera will likely be casualties this time around.

According to Sports Illustrated’s Richard Deitsch, ESPN management has been ordered to trim tens of millions of salary from its payroll over the next four months. The company will reportedly buyout contracts in order to fulfill the mandate.

In a statement sent to SI, ESPN said these anticipated moves are a part of the network’s evolution.

“We have long been about serving fans and innovating to create the best content for them,” it reads. “Today’s fans consume content in many different ways and we are in a continuous process of adapting to change and improving what we do. Inevitably that has consequences for how we utilize our talent. We are confident that ESPN will continue to have a roster of talent that is unequaled in sports.”

It’s no secret that ESPN has been hemorrhaging subscribers in recent years. In February 2011, the network was available in more than 100 million households. As of December 2016, that number was down to 88.4 million. With soaring rights fees –– ESPN now pays $3.3 billion annually to broadcast the NFL and NBA –– and a decreased customer base, the company’s business model is being challenged. The decreased advertising revenue coming out of Bristol is one of the reasons why Disney, ESPN’s parent company, reported lower-than-anticipated first quarter earnings last month.

ESPN remains the dominant force in sports broadcasting. But in a changing media landscape, the challenges it faces aren’t going away. These expected layoffs are another reminder of this grim reality.

Read More: ESPN,
Colin Kaepernick ends his protest on disingenuous note 03.03.17 at 1:17 pm ET
By   |  Comments Off on Colin Kaepernick ends his protest on disingenuous note
Colin Kaepernick says he plans to end his national anthem protest in 2017. (Robert Hanashiro/USA TODAY Sports)

Colin Kaepernick says he plans to end his national anthem protest in 2017. (Robert Hanashiro/USA TODAY Sports)

Colin Kaepernick said last year he would keep kneeling during the national anthem until significant progress was made toward social justice reform. But now, after opting out of his contract with the 49ers, he plans to stop his protest. This makes his apparent quest for change seem disingenuous.

ESPN’s Adam Schefter reported Thursday the former San Francisco quarterback will stand for the “Star-Spangled Banner” in 2017. Kaepernick said he arrived at his decision because he doesn’t want his demonstration to distract from the positive impact he’s made on the issue of racial inequality. Apparently, he believes his work is done.

Kaepernick’s protest, which started in the preseason and continued through the entire regular season, was more than a symbolic gesture. His foundation gave $1 million to community organizations, with the 49ers matching his donations. He also organized and spoke at a camp for underprivileged kids in the Bay Area, setting up workshops that covered topics ranging from nutrition health to advice on how to interact with police officers. Kaepernick says he plans to continue those charitable endeavors, but without the accompanying public symbol.

While LeBron James and other NBA stars routinely speak out on social issues, Kaepernick’s protest sparked a national conversation. In addition to other NFL players, kids on high school and youth football teams across the country followed his lead. The Beaumont Bills, a Texas-based club comprised of 11- and 12-year olds, cancelled their season after some players decided to kneel to draw attention towards injustice. But now, without the safety net of a $14.3 million salary, Kaepernick is abandoning them.

With President Donald Trump in office, voices like Kaepernick’s are needed more than ever. Up to 8 million undocumented immigrants are now at risk of being deported under the administration’s new guidelines, including those who use food stamps and other social assistance programs. Trump is also promising to unveil a new travel ban that applies to several predominately Muslim countries, after the last one was overturned by a federal court.

The first hit to Kaepernick’s credibility as a social activist came shortly after Trump was elected to office, when he told reporters he sat out perhaps the most pivotal election in recent history. He made it clear last year he wasn’t a fan of Trump or Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, calling them “proven liars” and racists. It was a lazy take that did little to advance the national conversation.

“I’ve been very disconnected from the systematic oppression as a whole,” Kaepernick explained when asked why he didn’t vote. “So, for me, it’s another face that’s going to be the face of that system of oppression. And to me, it didn’t really matter who went in there. The system still remains intact that oppresses people of color.”

While that’s true, the Trump administration poses an unique threat to civil rights. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, whose federal judgeship appointment in the 1980’s was opposed by Coretta Scott King due to his history of clamping down on voting access, said this week the Justice Department will pull back on police department civil rights suits. The Justice Department under President Barack Obama opened 25 probes into police departments, including Ferguson, Missouri, which was found to have targeted the African-American community in an effort to increase city revenue.

There were also several ballot measures in California that spoke to directly to the issue of criminal justice reform, which Kaepernick says he’s passionate about. Prop 63 tightened the state’s gun laws, and Prop 64 legalized legalized marijuana. That should be a topic of great importance to Kaepernick, considering the ACLU found black people are 3.7 times more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession than white people. He spoke a lot about police practices, but did little to change them.

Kaepernick, of course, isn’t obligated to continue kneeling for the rest of his career. But given the nation’s current climate, this seems like a curious time to step aside. That is, unless Kaepernick is worried about hurting his value on the free agent market. With promises to curtail his protesting, he may become more attractive to teams that are leery of taking on a marginal quarterback with such a polarizing personality.

Muhammad Ali and other social justice crusaders weren’t afraid to suffer financially if it meant standing up for what they believe. It appears as if Kaepernick isn’t willing to make that kind of sacrifice.

Read More: Colin Kaepernick,
In a Twitter fight, Curt Schilling tells Rosie O’Donnell she’s spewing ‘poop and lies’ 03.02.17 at 4:35 pm ET
By   |  Comments Off on In a Twitter fight, Curt Schilling tells Rosie O’Donnell she’s spewing ‘poop and lies’
Curt Schilling has been a steadfast supporter of President Donald Trump. (Howard Smith/USA TODAY Sports)

Curt Schilling has been a steadfast supporter of President Donald Trump. (Howard Smith/USA TODAY Sports)

Curt Schilling and Rosie O’Donnell might be two of the most loudmouthed and opinionated people in the United States. It’s only fitting they’ve been entangled in a Twitter war with each other.

The war of words started when a random user named Mike shared a video with Schilling of O’Donnell calling for Donald Trump’s impeachment at a rally Tuesday. The liberal comedian led an anti-Trump event in front of the White House before the President spoke in front of a joint session of Congress.

“The evidence against Trump and Russia is huge and mounting every day. We see it, he can’t lie about it,” she said. “He is going down and so will all of his administration. The charge is treason.”

The FBI continues to investigate ties between Trump and Russia, after 17 federal intelligence agencies concluded last year the Kremlin interfered in the election on his behalf. Three Trump officials –– former campaign manager Paul Manafort, ex-foreign policy advisor Carter Page and short-lived national security advisor, Gen. Michael Flynn –– have all been forced to step down due to their ties to Vladimir Putin’s autocracy. Attorney General Jeff Sessions is now also under scrutiny, after the Washington Post reported he met twice with Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. while he was serving on Trump’s campaign. In his confirmation hearing, Sessions denied having any contact with Russian officials.

In response to O’Donnell’s claims, Schilling said she was spewing “poop and lies.”

Schilling then brought up O’Donnell’s disparaging comments about Trump’s 10-year-old son, Barron. The bombastic actress questioned in December whether Barron Trump is autistic, saying it potentially represented an “amazing opportunity” to bring attention to the epidemic. She apologized after Melania Trump threatened legal action.

O’Donnell tweeted “f— u” to Schilling, ending the conversation.

It’s been a busy stretch on Twitter for Schilling, who was smacked down earlier this week by former Missouri Secretary of State and U.S. army veteran, Jason Kander. He also recently defended right-wing troll Milo Yiannopoulos, then retreated after hearing the former Breitbart editor’s rationalization of pederasty.

Add his beef with O’Donnell to the list of greatest hits.

Read More: Curt Schilling,
Teenage transgender wrestling champion Mack Beggs is a living embodiment of courage 03.02.17 at 3:10 pm ET
By   |  Comments Off on Teenage transgender wrestling champion Mack Beggs is a living embodiment of courage

The word “courageous” gets tossed around carelessly these days. But in a sports context, it’s difficult to think of somebody who fits the word better than Mack Beggs, the 17-year-old transgender Texas state girls’ wrestling champion.

Beggs, who identifies as male, wasn’t permitted to wrestle boys this year. The University Interscholastic League, which oversees athletics in Texas public schools, says students’ genders must be based off their birth certificates. So Beggs was forced to wrestle girls. He went 56-0 this season and knocked off Chelsea Sanchez for the 110-pound weight class title last weekend. When the Euless Trinity junior’s hand was raised in victory, he was greeted with an impassioned mix of boos and cheers.

“I just heard the boos, but I heard more cheering,” Beggs told ESPN Wednesday. “Honestly, I was like, ‘You know what? Boo all you want, because you’re just hating. You hating ain’t going to get me and you nowhere, and I’m just going to keep on doing what I’ve got to do.’

Many of Beggs’ detractors, including WEEI’s Gerry Callahan, say he shouldn’t have been allowed to compete at all.

“Sometimes you’re not allowed to do what you want to do,” Callahan told me on the radio this week. “It’s totally unfair to ask a boy to make a move –– a lot moves go right to the crotch. You want a boy doing that to a girl?”

It wasn’t Beggs’ choice to wrestle in the girls’ division. His attorney says he wanted to face boys, but was rebuffed. At that moment, he was faced with a choice: stop wrestling because of who he is, or keep pressing forward. Beggs chose the latter, and says he was faced with taunts throughout the entirety of the season. He was called “”f—-t” and “it,” with some opponents declining to step onto the mat with him. One of his friends’ fathers even sued him, saying he will bring “imminent threat of bodily harm” to the girls he’s competing against.

That’s a lot of trouble to go through just to wrestle. People who suggest Beggs, or other student-athletes in his position, change their gender identities to gain a competitive advantage are out of their minds. Beggs just wants to embrace who he is.

“You just have to stay strong,” he said. “There’s going to be sucky days. There is going to be sucky days, believe me. … There’s always going to be another day. There’s always going to be another week. You’ve just got to keep on rolling.”

It’s understandable why some parents are apprehensive about their daughters facing Beggs, who’s been taking testosterone injections in order to expedite his transition from female-to-male. But the fault here lies with the UIL, which prohibits Beggs from competing against other males. Irate parents should take their complaints to the state. It’s not Beggs’ responsibility to worry about the comfort of his opponents. He must do what’s best for him.

Transgender kids are some of the most vulnerable people in the U.S. More than 80 percent of transgender students say they feel threatened at school, and 41 percent of transgender people say they’ve tried to commit suicide at least once in their lives. The suicide attempt rate of the overall U.S. population is 4.6 percent.

In his interview with ESPN, Beggs said he thought about taking his own life when he was in seventh grade. By refusing to cower to social pressure, he may now be a role model to other transgender kids who are entertaining those same dark thoughts. Thanks to the Trump administration’s decision to overturn federal protections for transgender students, a simple act like going to the bathroom could now be a traumatizing experience for some. Imagine living in a world where you’re perceived as such an outcast, that performing even a basic bodily function could invite scorn and ridicule. It’s important for the marginalized to see others who stand up against adversity, and raise their hands high –– just like Beggs.

Today, only 16 states and the District of Columbia permit transgender student-athletes to compete based on their gender identity sans medical intervention. Seven states require an amended birth certificate or proof of medical action, such as surgery or hormones. In Texas, birth certificates can only be changed with a court order. It’s an expensive and arduous process, meant to make it difficult for transgender people to be who they are.

After going through this season, perhaps Beggs will serve as a trailblazer when it comes to transgender rights in the athletic community. It’s his most consequential fight yet.

Ex-NBA star Amar’e Stoudemire: I would ‘shower across the street’ to avoid gay teammate 03.01.17 at 4:09 pm ET
By   |  Comments Off on Ex-NBA star Amar’e Stoudemire: I would ‘shower across the street’ to avoid gay teammate
Amar'e Stoudemire averaged 18.9 points per game during his NBA career. (Richard Mackson/USA TODAY Sports)

Amar’e Stoudemire averaged 18.9 points per game during his NBA career. (Richard Mackson/USA TODAY Sports)

When former NBA center Jason Collins came out of the closet four years ago, he appeared to receive widespread support around the league. Several stars, including LeBron James and Kobe Bryant, tweeted out their admiration for him. But it’s important to remember that despite public displays of solidarity, homophobia still persists in locker rooms across the country. Six-time NBA All-Star Amar’e Stoudemire demonstrated that this week when he was asked about the prospect of having a gay teammate.

In an interview with the Israel-based Walla! Sports, Stoudemire said he wouldn’t feel comfortable sharing a post-game shower with a gay person.

“I’m going to shower across the street. Make sure my change of clothes are around the corner. And I’m going to drive — take a different route to the gym,” he said.

The former Suns and Knicks forward didn’t back off when he was asked whether he was kidding.

“There’s always a truth within a joke,” Stoudemire said.

After 15 seasons in the NBA, Stoudemire is currently playing for Hapoel Jerusalem of Israel’s Premier League. He was fined $50,000 in 2012 for tweeting a gay slur during the offseason, which he apologized for.

“I am a huge supporter of civil rights for all people,” he said, via ESPN. “I am disappointed in myself for my statement to a fan. I should have known better and there is no excuse.”

But after listening to Stoudemire’s most recent comments, it’s apparent his apology was little more than lip service. Considering no active player in the four major professional sports leagues has come out since Collins and former NFL prospect Michael Sam in 2013, it’s safe to surmise Stoudemire probably isn’t alone, either. On a corporate level, the sports world is more tolerant than ever before. But Stoudemire’s statement is a reminder there’s still a lot of work to be done.

Read More: Amar'e Stoudemire,
Glen ‘Big Baby’ Davis is still ripping Doc Rivers 03.01.17 at 2:40 pm ET
By   |  Comments Off on Glen ‘Big Baby’ Davis is still ripping Doc Rivers
Glen Davis played under Doc Rivers with the Celtics from 2007-2011. (Gary A. Vasquez/USA TODAY Sports)

Glen Davis played under Doc Rivers with the Celtics from 2007-2011. (Gary A. Vasquez/USA TODAY Sports)

Glen “Big Baby” Davis continues to attack his former coach, Doc Rivers.

In an interview on NBA Insider Chris Broussard’s podcast two weeks ago, Davis called Rivers “overrated” and said he was “lucky as hell” to win a championship with the Celtics in 2008. As a guest on FS1’s “Undisputed” Wednesday,” the ex-LSU star took his criticisms of Rivers one step further.

“I think that he’s so caught up in being the president that hey, you need to be the coach. Danny Ainge was the president, and he got everything done the way it was supposed to be done,” Davis said. “He didn’t have to worry about that. Coach the game like you know how to coach. You’re an X’s and O’s coach. Get a great defensive minded coach like [Tom] Thibodeau once again.”

It’s been an up-and-down run for Rivers with the Clippers, who acquired him from the Celtics for a first-round pick in 2013. Though the Clippers have won more than 50 games in each of Rivers’ three seasons, they’ve failed to advance past the conference semifinals. Perhaps their biggest playoff disappointment came in 2015, when they blew a 3-1 lead against the Rockets. Davis says that series solidified his feelings about Rivers being overmatched in his role as Clippers coach and president of basketball operations.

“So I’ve seen the process. I know. I’ve been in the locker room when it was 3-1 against Houston and we lost. So, I see it. It’s just the fact, does he see it? Does he see it?,” he asked.

Davis’ apparent animosity towards Rivers dates back to his ankle injury in 2015, which he says was misdiagnosed. The 6-foot-9 forward hasn’t played in the NBA since.

“When you win a championship with somebody, you don’t treat nobody like that,” Davis said on Broussard’s podcast last month. “No matter if it’s a business or not, because it’s bigger than basketball between us, Doc. I’ve never left you at the altar. I’ve never left you at the altar. I never left. You got get Spencer Hawes, he does nothing, you gotta trade him. You got me on the bench, knowing that I could play, but you still go play Spencer Hawes … you’re just trying to cover your own butt because Spencer’s not panning out the way you want him to pan out, and I just don’t like that.”

Read More: doc rivers, Glen Davis,
Katie Nolan is overrated 03.01.17 at 12:37 pm ET
By   |  Comments Off on Katie Nolan is overrated
Katie Nolan is reportedly on the cusp of receiving a major push at FS1. (Kirby Lee/USA TODAY Sports)

Katie Nolan is reportedly being wooed by ESPN. (Kirby Lee/USA TODAY Sports)

Katie Nolan is a superstar within the echo chamber of Twitter. But outside the cozy confines of social media, she’s a relative non-factor.

With 18 months left on her exclusive deal with Fox Sports, Nolan is reportedly being groomed for a larger role at the network. An unnamed FS1 executive told Sporting News last week the Framingham native’s TV exposure is going to increase “five-fold” following the cancellation of “Garbage Time,” her irreverent and lowly rated late-night talk show. But FS1 may have some competition for Nolan going forward. According to Sporting News’ Michael McCarthy, ESPN is wooing her for a role at the WorldWide Leader, perhaps to take part in a new national morning program with Mike Greenberg. The “Mike and Mike” co-host inked a new mega-contract with ESPN last year that will reportedly pay him $6.5 million annually.

Nolan, 30, first rose to prominence three years ago when she released an introspective commentary about the NFL’s gross mishandling of the Ray Rice domestic violence case. In it, she recounts her decision to pull back from asking Roger Goodell about the leniency of Rice’s original two-game suspension at a Fox Sports event, out of fear it would anger her superiors. Nolan chides herself for staying silent, and vows to be a leading opinionated female sports voice.

“It’s time for women to have a seat at the big boy table,” she says. “And not where their presence is a gimmick or a concept. Just a person who happens to have breasts offering their opinion on the sports they love and the topics they know. Because the truth is, the NFL will never respect women and their opinions as long as the media it answers to doesn’t. I’m ready when you are, Fox.”

Roughly six months after the Rice video, which has been viewed nearly 388,000 times on YouTube, Nolan launched “Garbage Time” in March 2015. But outside of a blistering rant about the media’s coverage of Greg Hardy’s return to the NFL, she failed to make noise on her weekly show. Last spring, SportsTVRatings calculated that “First Take,” the often mocked shout fest on ESPN, was nearly 14 times more popular than “Garbage Time.” Nolan averaged roughly 32,666 viewers per episode for her first three shows this year, drawing about one-third of the audience that Skip Bayless’ Undisputed attracted last week –– during the doldrums of the sports calendar. (More recent “Garbage Time” viewership data isn’t available.)

Nolan’s abysmal ratings may be more of a commentary on FS1 than her. The network also cancelled “Fox Sports Live” last week, after the highlight-centric show with Canadian anchors Jay Onrait and Dan O’Toole couldn’t attract an audience in four years. FS1’s lack of live game coverage at night gives it a dramatic disadvantage against ESPN, which owns rights agreements with almost every major sports league. With the absence of a strong lead-in, it’s difficult for FS1 studio shows to gain traction. This was evident last fall, when the station fell from first to 60th among cable networks in primetime ratings after the World Series had started airing exclusively on Fox.

It’s apparent that Nolan is talented and deserves the opportunity to have a bigger platform. Fox Sports missed a chance to do that at the Super Bowl, when it relegated her to social media segments during pregame coverage.

But make no mistake: Nolan is far from a TV star. As she demonstrated with her viral videos about Rice and Hardy, it’s possible to gain traction with a limited platform. As long as the content is good, people will generally find it. But it’s been more than one year since Nolan has factored into the news cycle. Perhaps her most recent notable bit was a crowdfunding effort last summer to buy David Ortiz a bench to put in Central Park –– a lame gimmick that doesn’t seem befitting for somebody who says she wants be a leading female sports voice.

It’s probably tempting for ESPN to throw millions at Nolan and thrust her into a leading role. She’s shown flashes of brilliance, willing to buck conventional wisdom and condemn the usually staid sports media industry. But right now, outside of the insulated world of social media, Nolan is a fringe player. She’s more notable in theory than reality.

Read More: Katie Nolan,
Draymond Green continues his feud with Paul Pierce by taking a shot at his Celtics career 03.01.17 at 9:43 am ET
By   |  Comments Off on Draymond Green continues his feud with Paul Pierce by taking a shot at his Celtics career
Paul Pierce is in a war of words with Draymond Green. (Bob DeChiara/USA TODAY Sports)

Paul Pierce is in a war of words with Draymond Green. (Bob DeChiara/USA TODAY Sports)

After withstanding a Twitter beatdown from Paul Pierce last week, Warriors forward Draymond Green has fired back with vengeance.

The latest chapter in the Pierce-Green feud happened Tuesday, when Green took a shot at Pierce’s career with the Celtics on his podcast.

“People tend to forget he was struggling to to get to the playoffs … Then all of a sudden Ray Allen and KG showed up. Let’s not forget that,” he said. “Just because you were scoring points don’t mean you were carrying the team. If you couldn’t get anywhere and you couldn’t do nothing, where were you carrying them to? … Pierce had had an amazing career. He was a beast. But how far was he carrying those teams? If you weren’t carrying them that far, I guess we’re in the same boat.”

During the Warriors-Clippers contest last Thursday, Green told Pierce, who’s in his final season, he’s not deserving of a farewell tour. That prompted Pierce to remind Green about the Warriors’ collapse against the Cavaliers in the NBA Finals last season.

While Green has a point about Pierce needing Kevin Garnett and Allen to reach the promised land, that’s hardly a negative commentary on the Truth. It takes more than one star to achieve success. Just ask Thunder point guard Russell Westbrook, who’s averaging a triple-double this season and will be lucky to win a first-round series.

The Clippers and Warriors don’t face each other again this season, so if Pierce and Green are going to continue their beef, it will likely have to wait until the playoffs.

Read More: Draymond Green, Paul Pierce,
Curt Schilling tries to flaunt his military credentials on Twitter, gets smacked down by an U.S. army veteran 02.28.17 at 12:04 pm ET
By   |  Comments Off on Curt Schilling tries to flaunt his military credentials on Twitter, gets smacked down by an U.S. army veteran
Curt Schilling is no stranger to Twitter wars. (David Manning/USA TODAY Sports)

Curt Schilling is no stranger to Twitter wars. (David Manning/USA TODAY Sports)

It’s been a rough stretch for Curt Schilling on Twitter. Last week, he defended right-wing troll Milo Yiannopoulos, then retreated after hearing the former Breitbart editor’s rationalization of pederasty. But that fleeting moment of embarrassment pales in comparison to the pummeling Schilling took Tuesday, when he tried to explain away Donald Trump’s degradation of the U.S. military.

In a speech Monday about his plans to increase defense spending, President Trump said U.S. soldiers are hapless in combat.

“We must ensure that our courageous servicemen and women have the tools they can be to deter war, and when called upon to fight in our name, only do one thing: win,” he said. “We never win and we don’t fight to win. We don’t fight to win. We’ve either got to win or don’t fight it at all.”

After those remarks, former Missouri Security of State and Afghanistan war veteran Jason Kander condemned Trump on Twitter. Schilling fired back, saying Trump was talking about military leadership, not the troops on the ground.

Trump routinely lambasted the U.S. armed forces during his ascent to the Oval Office. Last year, he claimed to know more about defeating ISIS than our country’s generals. He’s extended his ire towards the intelligence community in recent months, comparing it to Nazi Germany.

Later in the unsolicited Twitter exchange, Schilling cited his military credentials, saying he once spent 18 days with troops in the Middle East. Kander, who was a decorated intelligence officer in the Army National Guard, responded in kind.

Stop the match. Kander wins in a knockout.

Read More: Curt Schilling,